Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pulsating auroras have often been erroneously discussed as if they are a single phenomenon. For this reason, the relationship between different pulsating auroras is poorly understood. Grono and Donovan (2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-891-2018 ) subcategorized pulsating auroras into amorphous pulsating, patchy pulsating, and patchy auroras, which are separable based on their pulsation and structuring. By comparing the latitudes of these auroras to the location of the proton aurora, we have constrained their source regions for the first time. Pulsating aurora does not occur poleward of the proton aurora. Amorphous pulsating aurora occurs within and equatorward of the proton aurora, while patchy pulsating and patchy auroras predominantly occur equatorward of the optical b2i boundary. This indicates that the characteristic structuring of the patchy auroras is unable to form outside of the mostly dipolar inner magnetosphere, but the wave‐particle interactions that produce auroral pulsations are less constrained, extending into the transition region where the magnetic field begins to stretch.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".