The Vertical City Weather Generator (VCWG v1.0.0)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The Vertical City Weather Generator (VCWG) is a computationally efficient urban microclimate model developed to predict temporal and vertical variation of temperature, wind speed, and specific humidity. It is composed of various sub models: a rural model, an urban microclimate model, and a building energy model. In a nearby rural site, a rural model is forced with weather data to solve a vertical diffusion equation to calculate vertical potential temperature profiles using a novel parameterization. The rural model also calculates a horizontal pressure gradient. The rural model outputs are then forced on a vertical diffusion urban microclimate model that solves vertical transport equations for momentum, temperature, and specific humidity. The urban microclimate model is also coupled to a building energy model using feedback interaction. The aerodynamic and thermal effects of urban elements and vegetation are considered in VCWG. To evaluate the VCWG model, a microclimate field campaign was held in Guelph, Canada, from 15 July 2018 to 5 September 2018. The meteorological measurements were carried out under a comprehensive set of wind directions, wind speeds, and thermal stability conditions in both the rural and the nearby urban areas. The model evaluation indicated that the VCWG predicted vertical profiles of meteorological variables in reasonable agreement with field measurements for selected days. In comparison to measurements, the overall model biases for potential temperature, wind speed, and specific humidity were within 5 %, 11 %, and 7 %, respectively. The performance of the model was further explored to investigate the effects of urban configurations such as plan and frontal area densities, varying levels of vegetation, seasonal variations, different climate zones, and time series analysis on the model predictions. The results obtained from the explorations were reasonably consistent with previous studies in the literature, justifying the reliability and computational efficiency of VCWG for operational urban development projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".