MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970813208 · doi:10.1002/cctc.201901187

Meet the <i>Women of Catalysis</i>

2019· article· en· W2970813208 on OpenAlexafffund
Petra E. de Jongh, Deryn E. Fogg, Li‐Zhu Wu, Sandra González‐Gallardo

Bibliographic record

VenueChemCatChem · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersTechnische Universität MünchenUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsVisibilityCatalysisRepresentation (politics)Resource (disambiguation)Field (mathematics)Political scienceEngineering ethicsNanotechnologyChemistryEngineeringComputer scienceOrganic chemistryMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ChemCatChem celebrates the achievements of female‐led research groups in the field of catalysis. With this initiative, we seek to highlight the breadth and depth of the best research developed by women, and to increase its visibility in the wider catalysis community. Women of Catalysis offers a resource to aid in improving the representation of female scientific talent on invited speaker lists, conference and editorial boards, and as leaders in research consortia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemCatChemSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207