The effect of high-speed videoendoscopy configuration on reduced-order model parameter estimates by Bayesian inference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bayesian inference has been previously demonstrated as a viable inverse analysis tool for estimating subject-specific reduced-order model parameters and uncertainties. However, previous studies have relied upon simulated glottal area waveforms with superimposed random noise as the measurement. In practice, high-speed videoendoscopy is used to measure glottal area, which introduces practical imaging effects not captured in simulated data, such as viewing angle, frame rate, and camera resolution. Herein, high-speed videos of the vocal folds were approximated by recording the trajectories of physical vocal fold models controlled by a symmetric body-cover model. Twenty videos were recorded, varying subglottal pressure, cricothyroid activation, and viewing angle, with frame rate and video resolution varied by digital video manipulation. Bayesian inference was used to estimate subglottal pressure and cricothyroid activation from glottal area waveforms extracted from the videos. The resulting estimates show off-axis viewing of 10° can lead to a 10% bias in the estimated subglottal pressure. A viewing model is introduced such that viewing angle can be included as an estimated parameter, which alleviates estimate bias. Frame rate and pixel resolution were found to primarily affect uncertainty of parameter estimates up to a limit where spatial and temporal resolutions were too poor to resolve the glottal area. Since many high-speed cameras have the ability to sacrifice spatial for temporal resolution, the findings herein suggest that Bayesian inference studies employing high-speed video should increase temporal resolutions at the expense of spatial resolution for reduced estimate uncertainties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.124 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".