MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970844620 · doi:10.7202/1062932ar

La sensibilité intégraliste sous la Révolution tranquille : l’exemple des chrétiens de gauche de la revue Maintenant (1962-1974)

2019· article· fr· W2970844620 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martin Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le contexte agité de la Révolution tranquille et du renouveau conciliaire, les chrétiens de gauche de la revue Maintenant ont conçu une forme particulière de sensibilité religieuse intégraliste. Ils confèrent, en effet, à la foi chrétienne des incidences élargies, voire totalisantes qui excèdent les seules questions privées et ultimes, mais sans l’assortir de bases institutionnelles typiques d’une chrétienté. Ainsi, partisans d’un intégralisme minimal, ils se dissocient à la fois de la variante maximale de l’intégralisme et de la conception marginaliste du religieux. De la première, ils rejettent principalement l’idéal de chrétienté ; et de la seconde, ils refusent la réduction de la foi chrétienne aux seules questions intimes et ultimes, car, selon eux, elle ne saurait être sans incidences en matière sociopolitique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.021
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelleSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207