Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet entretien, la compositrice française Pascale Criton retrace les grandes lignes qui sous-tendent son écriture et sa pensée musicales. Passionnée par le continuum sonore, ses rencontres avec Ivan Wyschnegradsky, Gérard Grisey – mais aussi avec le philosophe Gilles Deleuze – dans le courant des années 1970, confirment son intérêt pour les micro-intervalles et la variabilité du son. La compositrice livre les enjeux qui mobilisent son attention au fil des oeuvres qui jalonnent son parcours, des années 1980 à aujourd’hui. L’idée d’interaction écosensible émerge avec l’emploi de scordaturas en 1/4, 1/12e et 1/16e de ton associées à la synthèse du son (Thymes, 1988), ou en référence à des comportements acoustiques (Artefact, 2001) qui renouvellent l’écriture du geste (Objectiles, 2002). Pascale Criton interroge aussi bien les techniques instrumentales que la notation et l’interprétation (Circle Process, 2012). Son utilisation des petites différences vise l’élargissement de la perception et s’étend aujourd’hui à une écoute sensible aux phénomènes acoustiques et perceptifs (Wander Steps, 2018).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".