On the Essence of Authorities Provided by Russian Federation to Interstate Association
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The trend of interstate association development, which is actively spreading in the modern world, entails many questions that require explanation at the theoretical level. Increasingly, the issue of the state right constitutionality to participate in such associations began to be raised with the transfer of part of its authority to the associations. With the implementation of this right, the problem of preserving the sovereignty of the union state appears. These issues are considered in the article on the example of participation of the Russian Federation in the Eurasian Economic Union. In this regard, the article describes the conditions under which it is possible to transfer some part of state powers to the supranational level. Various doctrinal approaches to the study of the concept of “authority”, “the authority of the Russian Federation” are also given. The use of such research methods as comparative legal, system-structural, formal-legal allowed the author to conclude that the transfer of part of the powers of the Russian Federation to the EAEU is constitutional and the legal nature of the interstate association itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".