MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970918181 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02615

Selective Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Method for Ultratrace Detection of Selenocyanate

2019· article· en· W2970918181 on OpenAlexaff
Enea Pagliano, Kelly L. LeBlanc, Zoltán Mester

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyDerivatizationMass spectrometryAnalyteGas chromatographyDetection limitChemical ionizationIsotope dilutionSeawaterAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Ionization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent interest in the determination of selenocyanate (SeCN–) in wastewater systems has spurred the development of analytical methods for its determination at the ultratrace level. Since most of the current procedures require complex and costly instrumental configurations, we have developed a simple and rapid gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS) method able to detect SeCN– in water samples with a LOD of 0.1 ng/g Se. A 1 mL volume of aqueous sample was buffered with sodium bicarbonate and treated with triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate for conversion of the analyte into volatile EtSeCN. The derivatization yield was higher than 90%, and it could tolerate concentrations of chloride or sulfate up to 2%. The EtSeCN was extracted in chloroform and could be detected in electron ionization and also in negative chemical ionization mode with a further gain in signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of 2. The method was applied for the analysis of natural waters with quantitation of SeCN– in the low ng/g region. The Se13C15N– internal standard could be used for isotope dilution. Quantitative spike recoveries of 1 ng/g Se were obtained from seawater and river water, and 1 ng/g Se could be quantified within a standard uncertainty of 15%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207