MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2970998983 · doi:10.1128/msystems.00247-19

Molecular Dating of the Emergence of Anaerobic Rumen Fungi and the Impact of Laterally Acquired Genes

2019· article· en· W2970998983 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yan Wang, Noha H. Youssef, Matthew Brian Couger, Radwa A. Hanafy, Mostafa S. Elshahed, Jason Stajich

Bibliographic record

VenuemSystems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIH Office of the DirectorCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Institute of Food and AgricultureNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRumenBiologyMetagenomicsMicrobiomeGeneGenomeHerbivoreGenomicsBotanyGeneticsBiochemistryFermentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The anaerobic gut fungi (AGF) or Neocallimastigomycota inhabit the rumen and alimentary tract of herbivorous mammals, where they play an important role in the degradation of plant fiber. Comparative genomic and phylogenomic analysis of the AGF has long been hampered by their fastidious growth pattern as well as their large and AT-biased genomes. We sequenced 21 AGF transcriptomes and combined them with 5 available genome sequences of AGF taxa to explore their evolutionary relationships, time their divergence, and characterize patterns of gene gain/loss associated with their evolution. We estimate that the most recent common ancestor of the AGF diverged 66 (±10) million years ago, a timeframe that coincides with the evolution of grasses (Poaceae), as well as the mammalian transition from insectivory to herbivory. The concordance of these independently estimated ages of AGF evolution, grasses evolution, and mammalian transition to herbivory suggest that AGF have been important in shaping the success of mammalian herbivory transition by improving the efficiency of energy acquisition from recalcitrant plant materials. Comparative genomics identified multiple lineage-specific genes and protein domains in the AGF, two of which were acquired from an animal host (galectin) and rumen gut bacteria (carbohydrate-binding domain) via horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Four of the bacterial derived “Cthe_2159” genes in AGF genomes also encode eukaryotic Pfam domains (“Atrophin-1”, “eIF-3_zeta”, “Nop14”, and “TPH”) indicating possible gene fusion events after the acquisition of “Cthe_2159” domain. A third AGF domain, plant-like polysaccharide lyase N-terminal domain (“Rhamnogal_lyase”), represents the first report from fungi that potentially aids AGF to degrade pectin. Analysis of genomic and transcriptomic sequences confirmed the presence and expression of these lineage-specific genes in nearly all AGF clades supporting the hypothesis that these laterally acquired and novel genes in fungi are likely functional. These genetic elements may contribute to the exceptional abilities of AGF to degrade plant biomass and enable metabolism of the rumen microbes and animal hosts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemSystems→Same topicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology→French-language works237,207→