Syntheses, Structures, and Bonding of NgF<sub>2</sub>⋅CrOF<sub>4</sub>, NgF<sub>2</sub>⋅2CrOF<sub>4</sub> (Ng=Kr, Xe), and (CrOF<sub>4</sub>)<sub>∞</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The noble‐gas difluoride adducts, NgF2⋅CrOF4 and NgF2⋅2CrOF4 (Ng=Kr and Xe), have been synthesized and structurally characterized at low temperatures by Raman spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The low fluoride ion affinity of CrOF4 renders it incapable of inducing fluoride ion transfer from NgF2 (Ng=Kr and Xe) to form ion‐paired salts of the [NgF]+ cations having either the [CrOF5]− or [Cr2O2F9]− anions. The crystal structures show the NgF2⋅CrOF4 adducts are comprised of Ft−Ng−Fb‐ ‐ ‐Cr(O)F4 structural units in which NgF2 is weakly coordinated to CrOF4 by means of a fluorine bridge, Fb, in which Ng−Fb is elongated relative to the terminal Ng−Ft bond. In contrast with XeF2⋅2MOF4 (M=Mo or W) and KrF2⋅2MoOF4, in which the Lewis acidic, F4(O)M‐ ‐ ‐Fb‐ ‐ ‐M(O)F3 moiety coordinates to Ng through a single M‐ ‐ ‐Fb−Ng bridge, both fluorine ligands of NgF2 coordinate to CrOF4 molecules to form F4(O)Cr‐ ‐ ‐Fb−Ng−Fb‐ ‐ ‐Cr(O)F4 adducts in which both Ng−Fb bonds are only marginally elongated relative to the Ng−F bonds of free NgF2. Quantum‐chemical calculations show that the Cr−Fb bonds of NgF2⋅CrOF4 and NgF2⋅2CrOF4 are predominantly electrostatic with a small degree of covalent character that accounts for their nonlinear Cr‐ ‐ ‐Fb−Ng bridge angles and staggered O−Cr‐ ‐ ‐Fb−Ng−Ft dihedral angles. The crystal structures and Raman spectra of two CrOF4 polymorphs have also been obtained. Both are comprised of fluorine‐bridged chains that are cis‐ and trans‐fluorine‐bridged with respect to oxygen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".