Modelling erythropoiesis in congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia type I (CDA-I)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We employ and extensively characterise an ex vivo culture system to study terminal erythroid maturation of CD34 + progenitors from the peripheral blood of normal individuals and patients with Congenital Dyserythropoietic Anaemia type 1 (CDA-I). Using morphological analysis, FACS analysis and the proteomic approach CyTOF, we analysed patient-derived erythroblasts stage-matched with those from healthy donors during the expansion phase and into early differentiation. In patient cells, aspects of disordered erythropoiesis manifest midway through differentiation, including increased proliferation and changes in the DNA accessibility profile. We also show that cultured erythroblasts from CDA-I patients recapitulate the pathognomic feature of this erythroid disorder with up to 40% of the cells having abnormal ‘spongy’ chromatin morphology by electron microscopy, as well as upregulation of GDF15, a marker of ineffective erythropoiesis. In the tertiary phase of culture, patient cells show significantly less enucleation and there is persistence of earlier erythroid precursors. Furthermore, the enucleation defect appears to be more severe in patients with mutations in C15orf41 , as compared to the other known causative gene CDAN1 , indicating a genotype/phenotype correlation in CDA-I. Such erythroblasts are a valuable resource for investigating the pathogenesis of this disease and provide the opportunity for streamlining diagnosis for CDA-I patients and ultimately other forms of unexplained anaemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".