Multivariate Analysis of Data on Migraine Treatment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Migraineur constitutes a multidimensional model of health disorder involving a complex combination of genetic, psychological, demographic, enviromental and economic factors. This model provides a framework to describe limitations of an individual functional ability and quality of life, and to aid in the elaboration of more adequate intervention programs for each patient. Our primary objective in this paper is a data-driven profiling of patients. The approach followed consists of examining affinity/dissimilarity between sufferers on the basis of different family of indicators and then aggregating multiple partial matrices, where each matrix expresses a particular notion of the dissimilarity of one patient from another. One important particularity of our method is the notion of multi-dimensional dissimilarity for static and dynamic indicators, without ignoring any portion of data. The partial dissimilarity matrices are assembled in the form of a global matrix, which is used as input of subsequent calculations, such as multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Our main contribution is to show how multi-scale, cross-section and longitudinal data from individuals involved in a migraine treatment program may optimally be combined to allow profiling migraine-affected patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it