MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Initial Phase 2 Results of Ibrutinib Combined with Carfilzomib/Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2017· article· en· W2971024070 on OpenAlexaff
Ajai Chari, Saulius Girnius, Saurabh Chhabra, Robert F. Cornell, Cristina Gasparetto, Chatchada Karanes, Matthew A. Lunning, Jeffrey Matous, Rubén Niesvizky, Chaim Shustik, Robert K. Stuart, Jason Lih, Yihua Lee, Zeena Salman, Thorsten Graef, Jason Valent

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarfilzomibIbrutinibMultiple myelomaMedicineLenalidomidePomalidomideDexamethasoneRefractory (planetary science)OncologyInternal medicineLeukemiaChronic lymphocytic leukemiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Despite recent advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), novel agents are needed to improve outcomes. Ibrutinib (ibr) is a first-in-class, once-daily oral inhibitor of Bruton9s tyrosine kinase (BTK), an enzyme implicated in the growth and survival of multiple myeloma (MM) cells, providing the rationale for evaluating BTK inhibitors in MM (Yang Cancer Res 2015). Study PCYC-1119 (NCT01962792) is an ongoing phase 1/2b study of ibr + carfilzomib (CFZ) ± dexamethasone (dex). Initial phase 1 data established ibr 840 mg daily (qd) with CFZ 20/36 mg/m2 twice weekly (biw) + dex 20 mg biw as the recommended phase 2b dose (RP2D) (Chari ASH 2015). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) received ≥2 prior therapies, including bortezomib (BTZ) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and had either no response or documented disease progression following the most recent treatment. The objectives of the phase 2 portion, in which pts received the RP2D of ibr with CFZ + dex, include overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS). Results: As of May 1, 2017, 72 pts had received ibr combined with CFZ ± dex across multiple dose levels; 40 of these pts had received the RP2D. Among all 72 pts, the median age was 63 years (range, 34-83) and the median time from diagnosis was 4.5 years (range, 0.5-25.3), consistent with what was previously reported in the phase 1 portion. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed locally identified that 10/72 (13.9%) and 9/72 (12.5%) pts had del(17)(p13) and t(4;14), respectively. Gene expression profiling (GEP) in an initial subset of 18 phase 2 pts revealed 8 (44%) pts as high-risk. Prior treatment exposure is summarized in Table 1. Duration of treatment ranged from 0 to 29 months, and 15 pts remain on treatment. Of the 40 pts who received the RP2D, 36 were evaluable for response (Table 2). The ORR was 72% and PFS was 11.6 mos. Subgroup analysis revealed favorable outcomes for BTZ-refractory (n=24, ORR 83% and PFS 13.8 mos) and high-risk patients (n=11, ORR 82% and PFS 9.8 mos). Since patients in the phase 1 dose escalation portion of the study received biologically active doses of all agents, the outcomes in the combined population (n=72) were also evaluated. The ORR and PFS for BTZ-refractory compared to non-BTZ refractory patients were 72% and 8.7 mos vs. 61% and 6.4 mos, respectively. For high-risk vs. non-high-risk patients, the ORR and PFS were 75% and 8.1 mos vs. 71% and 9.4 mos, respectively. The tolerability of the combination at the RP2D is consistent with safety observed in phase 1. Among the 40 RP2D pts, the most common (occurring in >25% of pts) all-grade nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) were nausea (50%), diarrhea (48%), fatigue (38%), cough (35%), hypertension (28%), gastroesophageal reflux (28%), and insomnia (28%). Grade ≥3 hematologic AEs occurring in >5% of pts included anemia (15%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8%). Grade ≥3 nonhematologic AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts were hypertension (18%), pneumonia (13%), diarrhea (10%), and hyperglycemia (10%). Among the 72 total pts, 36 pts experienced treatment-related serious AEs. Twenty-seven pts discontinued study treatment due to progressive disease; an additional 13 pts discontinued due to investigator or pt decision. While 16 pts (22%) of all 72 pts discontinued due to an AE, only 4 pts (10%) at RP2D did so, with 2 events related to psychiatric disorders (confusional state, depression), 1 gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and 1 event of pneumonia. For pts receiving the RP2D to date, there has been one report of cardiac flutter (grade 1) that resolved with no intervention and was attributed to CFZ. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: These data further support the RP2D of ibr 840 mg qd with CFZ 20/36 mg/m2 biw + dex 20 mg biw as an option for the treatment of RRMM. AEs were manageable, and the ORR of 72%, including 2 complete responses and 8 very good partial responses, is promising in this heavily refractory population. Importantly, the addition of ibrutinib to CFZ and dex may overcome the adverse prognosis associated with bortezomib resistance. The outcomes of high-risk patients are encouraging and warrant further study. Disclosures Chari: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Research funding (to AC9s institution); travel, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Biotest: Other: Research funding (to AC9s institution), Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Other: Research funding (to AC9s institution); Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Girnius: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Travel; consulting/advisory role on steering committee, Speakers Bureau. Chhabra: Cardinal Health: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Gasparetto: Janssen, BMS, Celgene: Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed; Janssen, BMS, Celgene, Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen, BMS, Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding. Lunning: Epizyme: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Matous: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Myeloma Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Shustik: Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Stuart: Bayer: Research Funding; Cantex: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Celator/Jazz: Research Funding; ONO: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Lih: AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Employment. Lee: Pharmacyclics: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Salman: AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Employment. Graef: Pharmacyclics: Employment, Patents & Royalties: oncology; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Valent: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207