Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The substance of the following essay was first delivered to the author ongregation, several years ago.A portion of it was, at a subsequent period, reproduced in a lecture read before " The Young Men's Christian Association," of Ottawa.The lecture appeared in one of the Ottawa papers at the time, and afterwards repeated enquiries were made for copies which could not be supplied.Quite recently, requests of a similar nature have been made, and the result is the present publication.The subject is believed to be one of great practical importance, and fitted to exert a powerful salutary influence upon the thoughts and actions of men.As a matter of such consequence, it was intended to be treated.- And now the attempt is given to the public, in the hope that the represen- tation of " the things above," and of the future blessedness of " the ran-* somed of the Lord," so much less dwelt upon by Christians now, than by Christ and His apostles, may have, through God's blessing, the effect of making "the Father's house dearer"-more like "sweet home" to His children, and also of awakening thought and desire, and helping towards their right direction in all classes of readers Kingston, Oct, 1861.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it