MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971045649 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kez300

Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis before and after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant—a systematic review

2019· review· en· W2971045649 on OpenAlexaff
Mathieu Puyade, Nancy Maltez, Pauline Lansiaux, G. Pugnet, P. Roblot, Inés Colmegna, Marie Hudson, Dominique Farge

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineTransplantationScleroderma (fungus)Hematopoietic stem cell transplantationRandomized controlled trialClinical trialPhysical therapyCyclophosphamideOncologyImmunologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: In severe rapidly progressive SSc, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) allows significant improvements in overall and event-free survival. We undertook this study to identify, appraise and synthesize the evidence on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after AHSCT for SSc. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, in PubMed and ScienceDirect from database inception to 1 February 2019. All articles with original HRQoL data were selected. RESULTS: The search identified 1080 articles, of which 8 were selected: 3 unblinded randomized controlled trials [American Scleroderma Stem Cell versus Immune Suppression Trial (ASSIST), Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Scleroderma, Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation), 3 uncontrolled phase I or II trials and 2 cohort studies. HRQoL data from 289 SSc patients treated with AHSCT and 125 treated with intravenous CYC as a comparator with median 1.25-4.5 years follow-up were included. HRQoL was evaluated with the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI; 275 patients), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36; 249 patients) and the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D; 138 patients). The quality of the studies was moderate to low. AHSCT was associated with significant improvement in the HAQ-DI (P = 0.02-<0.001), SF-36 Physical Component Summary score (P = 0.02-<0.0001) and EQ-5D index-based utility score (P < 0.001). The SF-36 Mental Component Summary score improved in the ASSIST (n = 19) and one small retrospective cohort (n = 30 patients, P = 0.005) but did not improve significantly in 2 randomized controlled trials (n = 200 patients, P = 0.1-0.91). CONCLUSION: AHSCT in severe SSc patients is associated with significant and durable improvement in physical HRQoL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.011
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207