Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning, A Study on Their Academic Achievement and Internet Addiction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Examining attitudes of students towards learning, their academic achievements and internet addictions is the mainfocus of this study. With the institution permission obtained from the Provincial Directorate of National Education ofİstanbul Governorship dated: 21.04.2016 and No: 59090411-20-E.4519158, a descriptive study in relationalscreening model was conducted. By evaluating the data of 355 students (158 male and 176 female), from 370students studying in the 9th, 10th, and 11th grades attending public high schools in the region of Kadıköy, İstanbulduring 2015-2016 academic year the outcome results were obtained. "Personal Information Form", "AttitudesTowards Learning" and “Computer Addiction for Adolescents” scales were used in order to collect research data. Byanalyzing the data with t test, one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and correlation statistical research techniques inthe SPSS 22.0 program, findings were obtained. A significance level of 0.05 was taken as the basis in the appliedstatistics. As per the findings, a difference was found in terms of internet addiction according to gender, academicachievement, homework habits, family activity frequency variables. Furthermore, a negative relationship was foundaccording to the correlation analysis result between students' attitudes towards learning and internet addiction. Inconclusion, in the light of the the research findings, it is possible to express that differentiation of students' attitudestowards learning can support effective and efficient use of information technologies. However, the negativedifferentiation of the attitudes towards learning can generate Internet addiction as a result of inefficient use of theinformation technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".