Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legal policy is a transformation of political goals into state programs and projects and achievement of such goals based on law. Nowadays the problem of effectiveness of legal policy is extremely discussable. We should underline that for the role of law in Russian society increases as well as a flow of legal information. Various legal acts have been adopted and the new system of legal regulation in different spheres (in particular, in politic sphere) is emerging. As the result our society, individuals and legal entities have more actively began using «Law» to solve their problems, to protect their rights, to resolve conflicts. But narrow-minded and weak legal policy with the inappropriate legislation is continuously being reflected in the unsatisfactory implementation of social, economy and etc. policies. So, the effectiveness of legal policy determines, inter alia, how effective are the legal policy entities. Some of them take part in all forms of legal policy realization, some of them are active only in particular form. This research helps to understand the peculiarities of the role of legal policy entities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it