Programmable DNA Nanoswitch Sensing with Solid-State Nanopores
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sensing performance of solid-state nanopores is limited by the fast kinetics of small molecular targets. To address this challenge, we translate the presence of a small target to a large conformational change of a long polymer. In this work, we explore the performance of solid-state nanopores for sensing the conformational states of molecular nanoswitches assembled using the principles of DNA origami. These programmable single-molecule switches show great potential in molecular diagnostics and long-term information storage. We investigate the translocation properties of linear and looped nanoswitch topologies using nanopores fabricated in thin membranes, ultimately comparing the performance of our nanopore platform for detecting the presence of a DNA analogue to a sequence found in a Zika virus biomarker gene with that of conventional gel electrophoresis. We found that our system provides a high-throughput method for quantifying several target concentrations within an order of magnitude by sensing only several hundred molecules using electronics of moderate bandwidth that are conventionally used in nanopore sensing systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it