MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971262151 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2019.0187

Energy‐efficient BBU pool virtualisation for C‐RAN with quality of service guarantees

2019· article· en· W2971262151 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa M. Abdelhakam, Mahmoud M. Elmesalawy, Mohamed Elhattab, Haitham H. Esmat

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Telecommunication Regulatory Authority
KeywordsC-RANVirtualizationComputer scienceQuality of serviceRanService (business)Computer networkEnergy (signal processing)BusinessRadio access networkOperating systemMathematicsCloud computingMarketingBase station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud radio access network (C‐RAN) has been introduced as a promising network paradigm for improving the spectral and energy efficiency of next‐generation mobile systems. In C‐RAN, the computation resources of the centralised baseband units (BBUs) can be virtualised and dynamically shared among cells for energy‐efficient BBU pool utilisation. In this study, a BBU virtualisation scheme is proposed to minimise the total power consumption in the BBU pool subject to constraints on users’ quality of service in terms of real‐time requirements, individual fronthaul capacity and BBU capacity. As the BBU processing time and transmission delay for each user data can be compromised to meet the user's real‐time requirements while minimising the BBU power consumption, a priori user association phase is proposed and formulated as an optimisation problem to maximise the users’ transmission rate, and hence minimising their transmission delay. Then, the BBU processing allocation phase is formulated as a bin‐packing problem to minimise the overall power consumption in the BBU pool. Since this problem is combinatorial, a heuristic algorithm is proposed based on best‐fit‐decreasing algorithm to solve it. Extensive simulations show that the proposed scheme outperforms the comparable ones in terms of power consumption with reduction up to 33%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207