MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971355996 · doi:10.4000/pds.3186

Montségur : le mythe à l’épreuve de l’archéologie

2019· article· fr· W2971355996 on OpenAlex
Laure Barthet, Michel Sabatier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatrimoines du Sud · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Montségur est sans aucun doute le plus emblématique des châteaux « cathares ». On dénombre, depuis le XIXe siècle, des dizaines de théories sulfureuses attachées à son nom. Toute approche scientifique se heurte à l’épaisse stratigraphie de la légende et il est encore difficile, pour un public parfois hésitant face à cette abondante littérature, de démêler le vrai du faux. L’archéologie offre cependant une lecture renouvelée du site. Les investigations conduites depuis la fin des années 1960 ont permis de mieux comprendre la forteresse et d’attirer l’attention sur d’autres vestiges, notamment ceux du castrum de la première moitié du XIIIe siècle et ceux des combats de 1243-1244. En s’appuyant sur les données récentes issues de la recherche, ces quelques pages proposent une lecture archéologique de Montségur et de son mythe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it