Znaczenie munduru polskiego żołnierza w kultywowaniu tradycji i patriotyzmu wśród Polonii kanadyjskiej
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Przez ponad sto lat głównym nośnikiem patriotyzmu wśród Polonii kanadyjskiej, obok polskiego kościoła, szkoły czy chóru, był mundur polskiego żołnierza. Czynnik ten niesłusznie był niedoceniany w badaniach nad Polonią kanadyjską. Kanada stanowiła ośrodek rekrutacyjny i treningowy dla Błękitnej Armii oraz Polskich Sił Zbrojnych na Zachodzie, odgrywających także olbrzymią rolę w promocji spraw polskich w Ameryce oraz wzmacniających uczucia patriotyczne Polonii. Po 1945 r. Kanada stała się bezpieczną przystanią dla tysięcy polskich żołnierzy niemogących powrócić do opanowanej przez komunistów Polski. Mundur i sztandar są nieodłącznym elementem, często najważniejszym, obchodzonych w Kanadzie polskich świąt narodowych i uroczystości patriotycznych. For over a hundred years, the main carrier of patriotism among Canadian Poles, next to the Polish Church, school or choir, was the uniform of a Polish soldier. This factor was wrongly underestimated in research on Canadian Polonia. Canada was a recruitment and training centre for the Blue Army and the Polish Armed Forces in the West, also playing an important role in promoting Polish affairs in America and strengthening the patriotic feelings of Polish Canadians. After 1945, Canada became a safe haven for thousands of Polish soldiers unable to return to communist-controlled Poland. The uniform and banner are an inseparable, often the most important element, of Polish national holidays and patriotic celebrations in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".