Optimal transceiver placement and resource allocation schemes in cooperative dynamic FSO networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cooperative dynamic free-space optical (FSO) networks exploit the fact that atmospheric losses are distance dependent to enhance the performance of FSO networks. This enhancement is achieved by sharing the resources of shorter links among different nodes in the network. In this paper, two joint transceiver placement and resource allocation schemes are proposed to optimally place FSO redundant transceivers based on optimal resource allocation in cooperative dynamic FSO networks. Specifically, one scheme increases reliability and capacity, while the other increases reliability and fairness of cooperative dynamic FSO networks during severe weather conditions. The schemes are formulated as multi-objective and bi-level integer linear programming problems and solved using an exhaustive search to obtain optimal solutions. The numerical results reveal that higher reliabilities can be achieved with enhanced capacities and fairness using the first and second schemes, respectively. Furthermore, these improvements are achieved by using many fewer numbers of FSO redundant transceivers than those of random placement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it