La psychoéducation à l’international : l’exemple du Chili
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La psychoéducation est-elle exportable ? Basé sur l’expérience d’un essai récent d’adaptation et de développement de la psychoéducation au Chili, cet article se penche sur le contexte et les conditions dans lesquels s’est déroulé ce projet ainsi que les défis et les obstacles auxquels ont dû faire face les acteurs. L’analyse de cette expérience a permis de dégager deux facteurs importants entourant la mise en place d’un projet psychoéducatif dans un contexte extérieur au Québec : (1) un esprit de collaboration et de co-construction est nécessaire de la part de tous les acteurs impliqués et (2) l’emphase sur la formation des éducateurs de 1 ière ligne constitue une condition sine qua non pour la mise en place d’une intervention de qualité. Finalement, trois contextes internationaux sont envisageables pour l’exportation de la psychoéducation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".