MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971428426 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2019-0124

Thermal behavior analysis and experimental study on the vertical machining center spindle

2019· article· en· W2971428426 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cheng Ming Kang, Chun Yu Zhao, Junqian Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachiningThermalMachine toolThermal conductionMechanical engineeringMechanism (biology)Rotation (mathematics)Thermal analysisRobustness (evolution)MechanicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal errors caused by spindle rotation is a major factor that influences the precision stability of CNC machine tools. To determine an effective method for reducing thermal errors, a thermal experiment was carried out on the spindle of a vertical drilling center. The thermal deformation mechanism and thermal error variations of the spindle are presented. Based on the generation, convection, and conduction theory of heat, the thermal field model of a spindle system is derived. The relationship between the thermal field and the radial thermal error is established using a physically based method. Finally, the effect of the thermal error model proposed is verified by both a simulation and experiment. The results recorded on the two CNC machining centers indicate that the average fitting accuracy of the theoretical model is up to 94.1%, which validates the high accuracy and strong robustness of the presented model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesFrench-language works237,207