Bibliographic record
Abstract
Judging by its popularity among writers, readers, and critical commentators, The Invisibles may be the comic book series that firmly established Grant Morrison as the most visible face of the sub-genre of the intellectual and philosophical comic book. While several religious and mystical traditions—including Buddhism, Hinduism, Aztec religions, and Kabbalah—combine to shape the terrain of conflict in the series, it is arguably Gnosticism that plays the primary role. The Invisibles operate invisibly by concealing themselves from their enemies: the demigod “Archons” who rule the materialistic and spiritually deficient universe and their minions among the human elites. Invisibility also characterizes the Gnostic divine realm known as the Pleroma, which can only be accessed through the hidden resources of the human spirit. Crucially, the narrative suggests that the marginal social positions occupied by the majority of the protagonists render these protagonists ideal as vehicles for the transmission of the knowledge and power of the Pleroma in the fallen human world. In The Invisibles, the cultural, economic, and political dimensions of social oppression unfold through and alongside a scenario that is central to Gnostic soteriology; humans who aspire to spiritual liberation must challenge the rule of the formidable Archons, who thrive by enslaving human consciousness within the spacetime matrix they control. In this article, I argue that, while meshing the Manichean dualities of Gnostic cosmology with the quotidian binaries of human life, The Invisibles subjects all dualities to an irenic synthesis; in the fullness of, and beyond, time, the struggles between normative and marginal, materialistic and spiritual, and darkness and light drive the Self to absorb and transform into value all of the horrors that seem to negate its worth. The Invisibles suggests that this challenging form of gnosis is the only way for the Self to attain to its greater Gnostic Selfhood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".