Cognitive Risk Control for Mitigating Cyber-Attack in Smart Grid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we extend our previous research on uniting the Cognitive Dynamic Systems (CDS) and the Smart Grid (SG) by introducing Cognitive Risk Control (CRC). The CDS is a structured physical model and research tool inspired by certain features of the brain. The CRC is an advanced feature of the CDS that embodies the concept of predictive adaptation allowing it to bring risk under control in situations involving unexpected or abnormal uncertainty such as a cyber-attack. The False Data Injection (FDI) attack is a special class of cyber-attack targeting the SG that is able to bypass the traditional bad data detection techniques. Here we will demonstrate how the entropic state, which is the objective function of the CDS, is able to detect and bring FDI attacks under control under the action of CRC. Through Task-Switch control, the CDS is able to switch on a new executive with different set of actions that affects the system configuration to bring the risk under control during an attack. With the CDS acting as the supervisor of the SG, simulations are carried out on a 4 bus-system and IEEE 14-bus system to demonstrate the capability of CRC when faced with FDI attacks. The results show that this system has great potential for future SG systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".