MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971475470 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2018.8824609

Using Docker, an Industry Standard Technology to Run GATE Simulation on Multiple Platforms

2018· article· en· W2971475470 on OpenAlex
Arnaud Samson, Émilie Gaudin, Roger Lecomte, Réjean Fontaine

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingPrivilege (computing)Grid computingSoftwareGridOperating systemSimple (philosophy)Distributed computingSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation is mandatory to initiate any new high energy physics or medical imaging experiments. These simulations generally consume a lot of computational resources. Parallelism on large clusters of computers is among the most efficient strategies to reduce simulation time [1] , [2] . These clusters are not easy to put in place since they are very expensive and power hungry. Furthermore, creating the environment to simulate on these clusters takes time because of the lack of high privilege access on the machines. Finally, because of the specificity of each computer grid, it is also difficult to share simulation environment and methodology between research groups. Nowadays companies like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft propose affordable cloud computing resources. In addition to those resources, containerization software like Docker enable the description of an environment in a simple text file called Docker image consequently easing the set-up and sharing of a simulation environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it