MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971502107 · doi:10.1049/iet-est.2018.5097

ICE/HPM generator range extender for a series hybrid EV powertrain

2019· article· en· W2971502107 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad S. Al‐Adsani, Ali Milad Jarushi, Omid Beik

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electrical Systems in Transportation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMagna International (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrime moverAutomotive engineeringGenerator (circuit theory)Range (aeronautics)Battery (electricity)PowertrainBattery packHybrid powerAuxiliary power unitElectric generatorEngineeringRectifier (neural networks)Permanent magnet synchronous generatorPower (physics)Electrical engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceTorqueMagnetAerospace engineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study discusses an optimised auxiliary power unit for applications in series hybrid electric vehicles (SHEVs). The auxiliary power source consists of an internal combustion engine (ICE) and a hybrid permanent magnet (HPM) generator. The ICE acts as a prime mover to the HPM generator the electrical output of which is connected to the vehicle DC‐link via a passive rectifier. The vehicle primary energy is supplied by a ZEBRA battery system while the ICE/HPM generator provides a range extension. The SHEV performance is evaluated over some driving cycles using performance indicators such as driving range, fuel consumption, emissions and, battery utilisation. A dynamic model of the ICE/HPM generator system is developed and a vehicle range, with consideration of the battery dynamics, is numerically evaluated via a simulation platform. The predicted results are compared with measurements from a laboratory prototype HPM generator system, which shows a good agreement hence validating the models and simulation platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Electrical Systems in TransportationSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207