MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971530104 · doi:10.24903/yrs.v3i1.190

KEWENANGAN PENGELOLAAN PEMBANGUNAN KAWASAN PERBATASAN KALIMANTAN BARAT - SARAWAK (Studi Dari Aspek UU No. 43 Tahun 2008 Tentang Wilayah Negara)

2017· article· id· W2971530104 on OpenAlex
Muhammad Syafei

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueYuriska Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)WiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menjadikan kawasan perbatasan sebagai beranda depan negara, merupakan visi utama pemerintah pusat dan daerah untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat di kawasan perbatasan Indonesia dengan negara tetangga. Karena itu, dengan terbentuknya Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2008 tentang Wilayah Negara dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2010 tentang Badan Nasional Pengelola Perbatasan, maka seharusnya tidak ada lagi alasan bahwa terabaikannya pelaksanaan pembangunan kawasan karena tidak memiliki payung hukum. Sebab, kewenangan pemerintah, pemerintah provinsi, pemerintah kabupaten, dan Badan Pengelola sudah diatur cukup jelas. Persoalannya, apakah dengan kewenangan tersebut, akan dapat dilaksanakan secara efektif, efisien dan mencapai target yang diharapkan? Kesemuanya itu sangat tergantung pada fakta kongkret implementasi Rencana Induk dan Rencana Aksinya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it