KEWENANGAN PENGELOLAAN PEMBANGUNAN KAWASAN PERBATASAN KALIMANTAN BARAT - SARAWAK (Studi Dari Aspek UU No. 43 Tahun 2008 Tentang Wilayah Negara)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Menjadikan kawasan perbatasan sebagai beranda depan negara, merupakan visi utama pemerintah pusat dan daerah untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan rakyat di kawasan perbatasan Indonesia dengan negara tetangga. Karena itu, dengan terbentuknya Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2008 tentang Wilayah Negara dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2010 tentang Badan Nasional Pengelola Perbatasan, maka seharusnya tidak ada lagi alasan bahwa terabaikannya pelaksanaan pembangunan kawasan karena tidak memiliki payung hukum. Sebab, kewenangan pemerintah, pemerintah provinsi, pemerintah kabupaten, dan Badan Pengelola sudah diatur cukup jelas. Persoalannya, apakah dengan kewenangan tersebut, akan dapat dilaksanakan secara efektif, efisien dan mencapai target yang diharapkan? Kesemuanya itu sangat tergantung pada fakta kongkret implementasi Rencana Induk dan Rencana Aksinya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".