MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971562434 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000003234

The Effect of Parity on Age-Related Degenerative Changes in Sagittal Balance

2019· article· en· W2971562434 on OpenAlexaff
Jeannie F. Bailey, Carolyn J. Sparrey, Frances M. K. Williams, Patrick F. Curran, Jeffrey C. Lotz, Patricia Ann Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParity (physics)Sagittal planeBalance (ability)Physical medicine and rehabilitationAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effects of parity (number of births) on measures of sagittal posture in elderly women. The long-term objective of this study is to identify and mitigate factors contributing to age-related postural deformity in older adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Adult spinal deformity is a prevalent condition that often requires costly surgical management. Females are disproportionately represented in spinal deformity surgical cases with up to 90% of patients being women. The potential contributions of pregnancy on postural degeneration have only begun to be acknowledged and require further study. METHODS: Two hundred eight women with standing lateral radiographs were selected from the TwinsUK register. Parity information was extracted from questionnaires. Sagittal balance measurements (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis [LL], pelvic incidence [PI]) were collected and PI-LL mismatch was calculated. One-way analysis of variance tests were done between three separate age categories for measures of sagittal balance and parity and stepwise multivariate regression was done for PI-LL. RESULTS: Both age and PI-LL mismatch significantly differed between parity categories. PI-LL was on average 7.0° ± 2.5° greater in multiparous (3+ births) subjects than in nulliparous subjects (P < 0.01). Parity did not have an independent relationship with lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar bone mineral density, or any of the individual sagittal balance parameters (P > 0.05 for all), except for PI-LL. From a subanalysis of the effect of parity on sagittal alignment within twin pairs, we found that within pair differences in parity associate with within pair differences in thoracic kyphosis. CONCLUSION: This study established correlations between measures of spinal curvature in older women and parity for the first time. Longitudinal research is required to establish a causative relationship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207