MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971576504 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32008-2

Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study

2019· article· en· W2971576504 on OpenAlexafffund
Salim Yusuf, Philip Joseph, Sumathy Rangarajan, Shofiqul Islam, Andrew Mente, Perry Hystad, Michael Bräuer, V. Raman Kutty, Rajeev Gupta, Andreas Wielgosz, Khalid F. AlHabib, Antonio Dans, Patricio López‐Jaramillo, Álvaro Avezum, Fernando Laņas, Aytekin Oğuz, Iolanthé M. Kruger, Rafael Díaz, Khalid Yusoff, Prem Mony, Jephat Chifamba, Karen Yeates, Roya Kelishadi, Afzalhussein Yusufali, Rasha Khatib, Omar Rahman, Katarzyna Zatońska, Romaina Iqbal, Wei Li, Bo Hu, Annika Rosengren, Manmeet Kaur, Viswanathan Mohan, Scott A. Lear, Koon Teo, Darryl P. Leong, Martin O’Donnell, Martin McKee, Gilles R. Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaHamilton Health SciencesUniversité LavalPopulation Health Research InstituteQueen's UniversityMcMaster University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthServierOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaBoehringer IngelheimCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAstraZeneca CanadaSanofiOffice of the DirectorGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsMedicineMiddle incomeEnvironmental healthProspective cohort studyCohortLow incomeLow and middle income countriesDiseaseCohort studyGerontologyDemographySocioeconomicsDeveloping countryEconomicsDemographic economicsEconomic growthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,963
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207