NHJ-1 regulates canonical non-homologous end joining in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Canonical non-homologous end joining (cNHEJ) is a near-universally conserved pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). While the cNHEJ pathway encompasses more than a dozen factors in vertebrates and is similarly complex in other eukaryotes, in the nematode C. elegans the entire known cNHEJ toolkit consists of two proteins that comprise the Ku ring complex, cku-70 and cku-80 , and the terminal ligase lig-4 . Here, we report the discovery of nhj-1 as the fourth cNHEJ factor in C. elegans . Observing a difference in the phenotypic response to ionizing radiation (IR) between two lines of the wild type N2 strain, we mapped the locus causative of IR-sensitivity to a candidate on chromosome V. Using CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis, we show that disrupting the nhj-1 sequence induces IR-sensitivity in an IR-resistant background. Double mutants of nhj-1 and the cNHEJ factors lig-4 or cku-80 do not exhibit additive IR-sensitivity, arguing that nhj-1 is a member of the cNHEJ pathway. Furthermore, like the loss of lig-4, the loss of nhj-1 in the com-1 genetic background, in which meiotic DSBs are repaired by cNHEJ instead of homologous recombination, increased the number of DAPI-staining bodies in diakinesis, consistent with increased chromosome fragmentation in the absence of cNHEJ repair. Finally, we show that NHJ-1 localizes to many somatic nuclei in the L1 larva, but not the primordial germline, which is in accord with a role in the predominantly somatically active cNHEJ. Although nhj-1 shares no sequence homology with other known eukaryotic cNHEJ factors and is taxonomically restricted to the Rhadbitid family, its discovery underscores the evolutionary plasticity of even highly conserved pathways, and may represent a springboard for further characterization of cNHEJ in C. elegans .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".