MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971614330 · doi:10.1249/jsr.0000000000000582

Open Water Swimming: Medical and Water Quality Considerations

2019· review· en· W2971614330 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Chamberlain, Ashley N. Marshall, Steven Keeler

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Sports Medicine Reports · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsCanadian Academy of Sport and Exercise MedicineUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAthletesCardiorespiratory fitnessScale (ratio)PopulationPhysical therapyIntensive care medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sport of open water swimming (OWS) has been popularized on a global scale. This population of athletes may experience several unique medical conditions, necessitating a review of medical issues and environmental considerations. Clinicians providing care for OWS athletes should be educated and trained to recognize and manage illnesses and conditions that often occur in an effort to ensure athlete safety. This article focuses on the major medical challenges faced in OWS, including a review of cardiorespiratory conditions and infections, competitor factors, water quality concerns, and risk minimization strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Sports Medicine ReportsSame topicSports injuries and preventionFrench-language works237,207