Cross-domain diabetic retinopathy detection using deep learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globally Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of blindness. But due to low patient to doctor ratio performing clinical retinal screening processes for all such patients is not always possible. In this paper a deep learning based automated diabetic retinopathy detection method is presented . Though different frameworks exist for classifying different retinal diseases with both shallow machine learning algorithms and deep learning algorithms, there is very little literature on the problem of variation of sources between training and test data. Kaggle EYEPACS data was used in this study for training the dataset and the Messidor dataset was used for testing the efficiency of the model. With proper data sampling, augmentation and pre-processing techniques it was possible to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy of classification using Messidor dataset (which had a different camera settings and resolutions of images). The model achieved significant performance with a sensitivity of almost 90% and specificity of 91. 94% with an average accuracy of 90. 4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it