MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971681742 · doi:10.1002/cl2.1042

PROTOCOL: The effects of empowerment‐based nutrition interventions on the nutritional status of adolescent girls in low‐ and middle‐income countries

2019· article· en· W2971681742 on OpenAlexaff
Alison Riddle, Cynthia M. Kroeger, Abigail Kaplan Ramage, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Carol Vlassoff, Monica Taljaard, Becky Skidmore, Vivian Welch, George A. Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueCampbell Systematic Reviews · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsCampbell Scientific (Canada)Ottawa HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationLatin AmericansMalnutritionEconomic growthPopulation growthPsychological interventionGerontologySocioeconomicsPolitical scienceMedicineEnvironmental healthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND 1.1 | The problem, condition or issue Adolescents (10 to 19 years) currently represent the largest global generation of young people in our collective history (United Nations, 2015).The regions of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean are the home of 1.1 billion young persons (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2017).In sub-Saharan Africa, people below the age of 25 make up 62% of the population, with only marginal declines predicted through 2050 (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019).The working age population (25 to 64 years) in sub-Saharan Africa, Oceania, and parts of Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean is growing faster than all other age groups (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019).Ensuring the health and well-being of adolescents who will fill the ranks of the world's working age population will help to propel global economic growth and development (Patton et al., 2016).Adolescence is a period of significant physiological change that includes marked skeletal growth, increased bone mass, and fundamental neurological development (Das et al., 2017;Patton et al., 2016).Proper nutrition during adolescence is crucial for optimal growth and development and helps to prepare adolescents for adulthood.However, many adolescents face challenges in achieving optimal dietary intake, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) where the majority of adolescents reside (WHO, 2014).Iron-deficiency anemia affects 430.7 million (24%) adolescents, with 77% of adolescents living with anaemia in multiburden countries where communicable, maternal, and nutritional conditions contribute to 2,500 disability adjusted lifeyears (DALYs) or more per 100,000 adolescents (Azzopardi et al., 2019).The prevalence of anaemia is consistently higher for females than males, and is more than 50% for females in Bhutan, Yemen, India, and Burkina Faso in 2016 (Azzopardi et al., 2019).Mean BMI (body mass index) and the prevalence of obesity are also rising among children and adolescents --------------------------------------------------------------

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2450.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCampbell Systematic ReviewsSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207