MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971691499 · doi:10.1201/9780429319778-94

Recent remote underwater surveys: Advances in methods and technologies for structural assessments of dams and spillways

2019· book-chapter· en· W2971691499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
K.W. Sherwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwaterEnvironmental scienceEngineeringCivil engineeringGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les progrès récents des technologies et des méthodes pour les relevés structurels sous-marins des barrages. Deux cas réels seront présentés. Le premier concerne l’examen en cours d’un déversoir d’un grand barrage canadien en érosion, au moyen de sonar multifaisceaux, de photogrammétrie, de laser et de vidéo HD. En particulier, les processus de calcul de la perte volumétrique de matière érodée sont discutés. La présentation couvre des questions telles que la portée et la résolution du sonar, le positionnement, la navigation, les méthodes hydro-acoustiques et autres pour la détection des fuites, ainsi que les défis logistiques rencontrés lors de la collecte de données sur le terrain. Des exemples de rendus sonar et d’autres méthodes de rapport sont également présentés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207