Effect of the incorporation of organoclay and melamine cyanurate on the flame retardancy and mechanical property of polyurethane foam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The polyurethane composites were prepared by a one‐pot free‐rising method with Melamine cyanurate (MC) and Cloisite 20A additives. Flame‐retardant and mechanical properties of the foams were investigated. The vertical burning test showed that PUF composite loading 15 wt% MC was reached V0 classification of V‐rating. Limiting oxygen index (LOI) test revealed that the PU foam changed from an especially flammable material (LOI = 18.4 %) to a flame‐resistant material (LOI = 24.1 %) upon adding 25 wt% MC. However, the presence of MC reduced the compressive strength of the foam. In this report, we demonstrated the incorporation of organoclay and MC into PUF could improve the flame retardancy and the compressive strength of polyurethane foam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".