MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971735532 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2018.8824467

Voxel-based partial volume correction of amyloid PET images incorporating non-local means regularization

2018· article· en· W2971735532 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanyuan Gao, Hao Zhang, Yansong Zhu, Murat Bilgel, Olivier Rousset, Susan M. Resnick, Dean F. Wong, Lijun Lu, Arman Rahmim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartial volumeRegularization (linguistics)VoxelIterative reconstructionAlgorithmWeightingMathematicsPixelComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceIndependent and identically distributed random variablesPattern recognition (psychology)Random variableStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyloid PET imaging is increasingly utilized to assess Alzheimer's disease. Nonetheless, PET imaging can be significantly degraded by the partial volume effect (PVE). This issue has been tackled via a number of post-reconstruction partial volume correction (PVC) methods. In our work, we proposed a voxel-based PVC method using non-local means (NLM) regularization under the weighted least squares framework that models the point-spread function of the PET system. The NLM algorithm has been proposed to suppress image noise while preserving edge information for natural images. This algorithm utilizes the high degree of information redundancy that typically exists in images and reduces image noise by replacing each pixel intensity with a weighted average of its non-local neighbors. Based on its advanced property, we propose to employ NLM as a regularization term in PET PVC. For a penalized weighted least squares (PWLS) objective function, we used the Gauss-Seidel (GS) optimization algorithm regularized with one-step-late (OSL) framework. Under the assumption of independent, identically-distributed (iid) Gaussian noise, the PWLS framework becomes standard least squares. When the steepest descent scheme is applied to the problem, it leads to the iterative `reblurred' Van Citter (VC) method. We tried both the VC method, and GS which involves a more sophisticated step-size method. In any case, the iid assumption is especially violated in OSEM reconstruction where the variance image is roughly proportional to the image (thus not uniform as in FBP). In the present work, we assessed the impact of appropriate variance weighting, as well as added NLM regularization. Our results demonstrate that statistical weighting improved quantitative bias vs. noise performance; and also, NLM regularization method exhibits improved performance. These were especially the case in the small regions relevant in Alzheimer's disease research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207