Zeta potentials of PDMS surfaces modified with poly(ethylene glycol) by physisorption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Controlling zeta potential of PDMS surface coated with a layer of PEG is important for electroosmosis and electrophoresis in PDMS made microfluidic chips. Here, zeta potentials of PDMS surfaces modified by simple physisorption of PEG of different concentrations in phosphate buffer solutions, pure water, and PEG solution were reported. Coating PEG on PDMS surfaces was achieved by immersing a PDMS layer into the PEG solution for 10 min and then taking it out and placing it in an oven at 80℃ for 10 h. To avoid damaging the PEG layer on the PDMS surface, an induction current method was employed for zeta potential measurement. Zeta potentials of PEG modified PDMS in electrolyte solutions were measured. The results show that 2.5% PEG can effectively modify PDMS surface with positive zeta potential value in phosphate buffer solutions, pure water and 10% PEG solution. Further increase in PEG solution beyond 5% for surface modification has no obvious effect on zeta potential change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".