SISTEM PEMBINAAN DAN PENGELOLAAN DANA PANTI ASUHAN ELISAMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses pelaksanaan pelayanan yang diperoleh anak asuh melalui pembinaan, bagaimana pola pembinaan yang diberikan, apa saja yang menjadi faktor-faktor pendukung dan penghambat pembinaan, dan apa saja dampak pelayanan yang diperoleh anak asuh melalui pembinaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu Pembinaan Pelayanan yang diperoleh anak asuh melalui pembinaan di Panti Asuhan Elisama bertujuan untuk memperbaiki diri anak asuh, menambah pengetahuan, menjadikan anak percaya diri dan tidak minder, dan mampu bersosialisasi sehingga kelak dapat menjadikan mereka menjadi sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas. Proses pembinaan di Panti Asuhan Panti Asuhan Elisama meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan pembinaan spiritual dan keterampilan serta evaluasi. Perencanaan meliputi rekrutmen anak asuh, menentukan jadwal, materi, metode dan media yang digunakan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".