MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971852503 · doi:10.23887/jinah.v8i3.20030

SISTEM PEMBINAAN DAN PENGELOLAAN DANA PANTI ASUHAN ELISAMA

2019· article· id· W2971852503 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyGynecologyArtMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses pelaksanaan pelayanan yang diperoleh anak asuh melalui pembinaan, bagaimana pola pembinaan yang diberikan, apa saja yang menjadi faktor-faktor pendukung dan penghambat pembinaan, dan apa saja dampak pelayanan yang diperoleh anak asuh melalui pembinaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu Pembinaan Pelayanan yang diperoleh anak asuh melalui pembinaan di Panti Asuhan Elisama bertujuan untuk memperbaiki diri anak asuh, menambah pengetahuan, menjadikan anak percaya diri dan tidak minder, dan mampu bersosialisasi sehingga kelak dapat menjadikan mereka menjadi sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas. Proses pembinaan di Panti Asuhan Panti Asuhan Elisama meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan pembinaan spiritual dan keterampilan serta evaluasi. Perencanaan meliputi rekrutmen anak asuh, menentukan jadwal, materi, metode dan media yang digunakan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it