On a Conjecture of Lovász on Circle-Representations of Simple 4-Regular Planar Graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lovász conjectured that every connected 4-regular planar graph $G$ admits a realization as a system of circles, i.e., it can be drawn on the plane utilizing a set of circles, such that the vertices of $G$ correspond to the intersection and touching points of the circles and the edges of $G$ are the arc segments among pairs of intersection and touching points of the circles. In this paper, we settle this conjecture. In particular, (a) we first provide tight upper and lower bounds on the number of circles needed in a realization of any simple 4-regular planar graph, (b) we affirmatively answer Lovász's conjecture, if $G$ is 3-connected, and, (c) we demonstrate an infinite class of simple connected 4-regular planar graphs which are not 3-connected (i.e., either simply connected or biconnected) and do not admit realizations as a system of circles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".