MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In Memoriam Grant Hieshima, MD: 1942–2019: Pioneer, Mentor, Visionary, Friend

2019· article· en· W2972023490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Randall T. Higashida

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiology practices and education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGerontologyOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grant Hieshima, MD died unexpectedly on August 9, 2019, at the age of 77, while enjoying one of his lifelong passions, deep-sea fishing, with his son Michael at his side. Grant was born in Southern California in 1942, and attended UCLA as an undergraduate. He received his medical education from Tulane University Medical School, in New Orleans, where he graduated with honors in 1969. Grant initially wanted to become a general surgeon but subsequently decided to pursue radiology with subspecialty training in neuroradiology and nuclear medicine. He was appointed to a faculty position in 1974 at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in Torrance, California where he began to develop techniques to manage vascular trauma. Figure 1 Grant Hieshima at the UCSF alumni reunion during the July 2018 SNIS Annual Meeting in San Francisco. In 1983, Dr John Bentson recruited Grant to UCLA Medical Center to start a new program in neurointerventional radiology (NIR). I was completing my final year of residency in radiology at UCLA, and after training with Grant, I asked to become his first NIR fellow. In the 1980s, the field of NIR was just beginning, and pioneers included Dr. Alejandro Berenstein at New York University; Dr. Chuck Kerber at The University of California, San Diego; Dr’s. Fernando Vinuela and Allan Fox at Toronto General Hospital; Dr. Gerard Debrun at the University of Illinois; Dr. Fedor Serbinenko at the Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute in Moscow; Dr’s. Victor Shcheglov and Alexander Zubkov, St Petersburg, Russia; Dr. Pierre Lasjaunias, Hospital Kremlin Bicetre, Paris; Dr. Charlie Strother, University of Wisconsin; and Dr. Grant Hieshima. At UCLA we would start at 7:30 am with morning read outs of CT brain scans, spend the afternoon performing diagnostic angiography, myelography, pneumoenchephalography of the brain ventricles, lumbar punctures for cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and then in the late afternoon would start NIR procedures, usually working until the …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroInterventional SurgerySame topicRadiology practices and educationFrench-language works237,207