MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972033936 · doi:10.25200/slj.v8.n1.2019.386

L’Age de faire : une scop de « presse pas pareille » a la croisee de mondes sociaux

2019· article· fr· W2972033936 on OpenAlexaff
Nils Solari

Bibliographic record

VenueSur le journalisme About journalism Sobre jornalismo · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Vieille-Capitale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex


 FR. Ce texte est issu d’une enquête en cours de finalisation, portant sur des entreprises de presse (huit en France et une en Espagne) qui ont été reprises ou transformées par leurs salariés sous la forme coopérative (Scop, SCIC). Il se focalise plus particulièrement sur l’un des terrains étudiés : le mensuel L’Âge de faire, édité par une petite rédaction basée dans le sud-est de la France. Crée en 2005 sous statut associatif, puis repris en scop par ses salariés fin 2011, c’est un des rares titres de presse indépendant, fonctionnant sans publicité, avec un modèle économique assis essentiellement sur son lectorat. S’appuyant sur le recueil d’un matériau qualitatif (9 entretiens réalisés entre juillet 2015 et avril 2016), cet article retrace l’historique de ce journal, de sa création à aujourd’hui, en évoquant la manière dont s’est structuré son modèle économique. Mais il entend surtout démontrer en quoi L’Âge de faire peut être envisagé à la croisée de divers mondes sociaux. Étant en effet porté sur « les initiatives visant une réappropriation citoyenne de l’économie, la création de lien social [et] un mode de vie plus écologique », L’Âge de faire serait à envisager comme un micro-monde à l’intersection de monde sociaux plus vastes : ceux des alternatives écologiques, de l’économie sociale et solidaire ou des milieux militants. Cette intersection se matérialiserait ainsi dans les interactions entretenues par le journal avec son lectorat et avec les acteurs de ces divers mondes sociaux qu’il dépeint et dont il retrace les évolutions et les débats internes. Ayant développé sa diffusion par sa présence dans les foires et salons « bio », L’Âge de faire a su tirer partie de son positionnement économique et éditorial singulier au sein du tiers-secteur médiatique en nourrissant son contenu des thématiques et questionnements qui traversent ces mêmes mondes sociaux.
 
 ***
 
 EN. This paper is the product of a survey currently being finalised covering news organisations (eight in France and one in Spain) that have been taken over or transformed by their employees into cooperatives (Scop, SCIC). It focuses on one of the samples studied: the monthly magazine L’Âge de faire, published by a small editorial office in south-eastern France. Created in 2005 as a non-profit organisation and then taken over by its employees at the end of 2011, it is one of the few independent publications that operate without advertising; its business model relying almost exclusively on its readership. Based on a corpus of qualitative material (nine interviews conducted between July 2015 and April 2016), this paper traces the history of the publication, from its creation until today, by analysing the evolution and structure of its business model. But above all, it aims to demonstrate how L’Âge de faire can be considered to be at the crossroads of various social worlds. Being focused on “initiatives aimed at regaining citizen ownership of the economy, creating social ties [and] a more ecological way of life,” L’Âge de faire can be considered a micro-world at the crossroads of broader social worlds: those of ecological alternatives, social and solidarity-based economies and militant circles. This intersection manifests in the publication’s interactions with its readers and with the actors of the various social worlds it depicts and whose internal evolutions and debates it charts. Having developed its readership through its presence at alternative fairs and exhibitions, L’Âge de faire has been able to take advantage of its unique economic and editorial positioning within third sector media by offering content with themes and questions that cut across these social worlds.
 
 ***
 
 PT. Este texto tem como base uma pesquisa que está sendo finalizada sobre empresas de mídia (oito na França e uma na Espanha) que foram assumidas ou transformadas por seus funcionários no formato de cooperativa (Scop, SCIC). Ele se concentra mais particularmente sobre um dos campos estudados: o jornal mensal L’Âge de faire, editado por uma pequena redação sediada no sudeste da França. Criado em 2005 com status associativo, assumido por seus funcionários no final de 2011, é um dos poucos títulos da imprensa independente, funcionando sem publicidade, com um modelo econômico baseado essencialmente em seus leitores. A partir da coleta de um material qualitativo (9 entrevistas realizadas entre julho de 2015 e abril de 2016), este artigo traça a história do jornal, desde a sua criação até hoje, evocando o modo como seu modelo econômico foi estruturado. Mas pretende, acima de tudo, mostrar como L’Âge de faire pode ser visto na encruzilhada de vários mundos sociais. Sendo realmente focado em « iniciativas voltadas para a reapropriação cidadã da economia, a criação de vínculos sociais [e] um modo de vida mais ecológico », L’Âge de faire seria considerada como um micromundo na intersecção de mundos sociais maiores: os das alternativas ecológicas, a da economia social e solidária ou dos círculos militantes. Essa intersecção se materializaria, assim, nas interações mantidas pelo jornal com seus leitores e com os atores desses vários mundos sociais que ele descreve e dos quais traça as evoluções e os debates internos. Tendo desenvolvido sua circulação por sua presença nas feiras e exposições « bio », L’Âge de faire soube aproveitar seu singular posicionamento econômico e editorial dentro da mídia do terceiro setor, alimentando seu conteúdo com temas e questões transversais a esses diferentes mundos sociais.
 
 ***

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSur le journalisme About journalism Sobre jornalismoSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207