MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972116450 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2019.8701059

A Stable Meshless Method for Electromagnetic Analysis

2019· article· en· W2972116450 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyan Zhang, Liwei Li, Zhizhang Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegularized meshless methodEigenvalues and eigenvectorsInterpolation (computer graphics)Moment (physics)InstabilityCondition numberMatrix (chemical analysis)Meshfree methodsMathematicsSampling (signal processing)Numerical stabilityApplied mathematicsStability (learning theory)Numerical analysisMethod of moments (probability theory)Mathematical optimizationSingular boundary methodComputer scienceMathematical analysisFinite element methodPhysicsMechanicsEngineeringStructural engineeringClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major problem in applying a meshless (RPIM) method is that when a large number of sampling nodes is used, the condition number of the moment matrix increases, and numerical solution becomes unstable due to the required inversion of the matrix. To address the problem, in this paper, with the radial point interpolation meshless (RPIM) method as an example, the moment matrix is first diagonalized and then the associated singular eigenvalues that cause the instability are truncated. As a result, the dependence of the stability on the number of the sampling nodes is removed. Numerical experiments are conducted, and the results have shown that the proposed algorithm are stable irrespective of number of sampling nodes; they pay the way forward for the meshless method to be applied to practical structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207