Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the global call to action for the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem in 2018, WHO has been drafting a strategy to achieve elimination in all countries through vaccination, screening, and treatment. Many high-income countries are on track to meet the proposed threshold for elimination—an age-standardised annual incidence of fewer than four cases of cervical cancers per 100 000 women—through human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cervical cancer screening programmes. However, elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem remains a challenge in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) because of the high cost of implementing and maintaining such programmes. In their Article in The Lancet Public Health, Changfa Xia and colleagues1Xia C Hu S Xu X et al.Projections up to 2100 and a budget optimisation strategy towards cervical cancer elimination in China: a modelling study.Lancet Public Health. 2019; 4: e462-e472Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar find that it would be possible to meet this threshold for elimination in China within the next century with vaccination and screening, even with reasonable budgetary constraints. This is welcome and encouraging news given the substantial burden of cervical cancer in China. More cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed in China per year than in any other country, accounting for around 20% of all estimated cervical cancers diagnosed worldwide in 2018. Simulation and economic studies such as those by Xia and colleagues are important to bolster policy makers’ confidence in public investments, such as HPV vaccination and screening programmes, given that such programmes require large upfront costs to achieve health benefits in the long-term. The results are also timely given the 2016 approval of existing HPV vaccines by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration and the prospect of a new low-cost domestic bivalent HPV vaccine candidate in China.2Li N Yu X Reversal of the marketing authorizations for HPV vaccines and uncertainty regarding utilization in China.Biotechnol Law Rep. 2018; 37: 211-214Crossref Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 3Qiao YL Wu T Li RC et al.Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-produced bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019; (published online May 11.)DOI:10.1093/jnci/djz074Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar However, the study by Xia and colleagues highlights an issue likely to arise in many countries where resources are scarce: the difficult question of whether to prioritise investments in screening or in HPV vaccination. Although both approaches prevent cervical cancer, vaccination is likely to be the most effective in the long-term because of its extremely high preventive efficacy.3Qiao YL Wu T Li RC et al.Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-produced bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomized clinical trial.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019; (published online May 11.)DOI:10.1093/jnci/djz074Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 4Paavonen J Naud P Salmeron J et al.Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women.Lancet. 2009; 374: 301-314Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1352) Google Scholar, 5Garland SM Hernandez-Avila M Wheeler CM et al.Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases.N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1928-1943Crossref PubMed Scopus (1561) Google Scholar Indeed, HPV vaccination programmes are likely necessary to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem,5Garland SM Hernandez-Avila M Wheeler CM et al.Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases.N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1928-1943Crossref PubMed Scopus (1561) Google Scholar given that even countries with high-quality screening programmes have not yet achieved an age-standardised incidence of fewer than four cases per 100 000 women. However, because the vaccine is most effective when given before initiation of sexual activity, vaccination programmes will mostly benefit younger and future generations of women. Further, because of the long natural history of cervical cancer, the health effects of vaccination will take many decades to be realised in China and other LMICs.6Simms KT Steinberg J Caruana M et al.Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020–99: a modelling study.Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 394-407Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (213) Google Scholar This inevitably raises the question of intergenerational equity. Although screening programmes on their own might be insufficient to reach the threshold for elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem, good screening programmes can more quickly decrease the burden of cervical cancer and would benefit both current and future generations of women. If nothing is done to improve current screening practices then, as Xia and colleagues predict, the number of cervical cancers diagnosed per year will keep increasing over the next few decades in China, due to increasing background cervical cancer incidence and an ageing population.7Jiang X Tang H Chen T Epidemiology of gynecologic cancers in China.J Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 29: e7Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar Several unanswered questions remain regarding optimal budget allocation. Because Xia and colleagues optimised their budget for the birth cohort of 2015, it is perhaps unsurprising that they find that the most effective strategy for future birth cohorts under the current (2012–18) budget is to first vaccinate them, and then to screen as many people as possible, when the cohort is older, with the leftover budget. However, the optimal strategy for the current age-structured population of China might be different, because the middle-aged women who would benefit more from screening account for a larger proportion of the population than young girls. More formal cost-utility analyses of integrated screening and vaccination strategies in an age-structured population should also be considered by policy makers, since cost-utility analyses could account for the time preferences for earlier health benefits through discounting (weighting short-term costs and benefits more than long-term costs and benefits).8Canfell K Shi JF Lew JB et al.Prevention of cervical cancer in rural China: Evaluation of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening strategies.Vaccine. 2011; 29: 2487-2494Crossref PubMed Scopus (65) Google Scholar However, the pitting of vaccination against screening presents a false dichotomy. It is likely that both screening and vaccination will be needed to successfully reduce cervical cancer incidence in many countries,6Simms KT Steinberg J Caruana M et al.Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020–99: a modelling study.Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20: 394-407Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (213) Google Scholar and WHO includes both vaccination and screening targets in its draft global elimination strategy. Although Xia and colleagues based their current budget for cervical cancer prevention on 2012–18 public financing for screening in China, additional public funding for HPV vaccines would likely come from different budget allocation structures, such as the Government's Expanded Programme on Immunization.9Zheng Y Rodewald L Yang J et al.The landscape of vaccines in China: history, classification, supply, and price.BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18: 502Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar Upscaling screening services in China still presents substantial logistical hurdles, including shortages of trained personnel, and a paucity of funding for the follow-up and management of screen-positive women.10Di J Rutherford S Chu C Review of the cervical cancer burden and population-based cervical cancer screening in China.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16: 7401-7407Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar Robust screening is still needed to guard against potential public confidence losses in vaccines, of which China has had its share. Nevertheless, the increased public funding for screening in China since 2009,10Di J Rutherford S Chu C Review of the cervical cancer burden and population-based cervical cancer screening in China.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16: 7401-7407Crossref PubMed Scopus (166) Google Scholar and the prospect of a domestically produced low-cost HPV vaccine, suggest that the more optimistic scenarios in the study by Xia and colleagues, which incorporate an increased budget for both screening and vaccination, are not so far from reach. I declare no competing interests. Projections up to 2100 and a budget optimisation strategy towards cervical cancer elimination in China: a modelling studyCervical cancer incidence in China will continue to increase under current cervical cancer prevention strategies. However, under our budget optimisation strategy from 2020 onwards, cervical cancer could be eliminated as a public health problem by the early 2070s. Elimination could be achieved by the late 2050s by increasing the budget towards vaccination against human papillomavirus and cervical cancer screening. Full-Text PDF Open AccessChina's health reform: 10 years onIn October, 2009, the Chinese Government launched Healthy China 2020—a political commitment to establishing an accessible, affordable, and efficient health system for all by 2020. The programme was later reinforced and expanded, in 2016, with Healthy China 2030, which incorporated the newly agreed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and propelled Healthy China reform into the SDGs era. On July 15, 2019, the State Council announced a series of 15 recommended actions to achieve Healthy China, focusing on public health and prevention. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".