MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2972139936 · doi:10.1111/hdi.12779

Forty‐five years on home hemodialysis, a case of exceptional longevity

2019· article· en· W2972139936 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sohail Abdul Salim, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Vonda Echols, Divya Monga, Jamie Davidson, Luis A. Juncos, Tibor Fülöp

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHome hemodialysisWitnessDialysisHemodialysisEnd stage renal diseaseLongevityDiseaseQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicineNursingLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

End-stage renal disease is associated with dismal long-term survival in general. Home hemodialysis (HHD) has been advocated as a modality affirming better quality of life and longer survival. We report a 62-year-old Caucasian female with end-stage renal disease who has been exclusively on HHD for a total of 45 years, utilizing various platforms over the years. She has been one of the first home dialysis patients of the founding father of renal dialysis in the state of Mississippi, John D. Bower and cared by him throughout his career. Throughout this period, her life bore witness to the evolving technology of dialysis accesses, platforms, and evolution of HHD in its entirety. After review of the literature, we find that the longest vintage time on HHD documented to date was around 35 years. This extraordinary longevity bears testimony to the extraordinary self-motivation of the patient, the dedication of her providers and the true potential of HHD in motivated subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→