MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972153908 · doi:10.1063/1.5097788

The long wave fluid flows on inclined porous media with nonlinear Forchheimer’s law

2019· article· en· W2972153908 on OpenAlexafffund
Hom N. Kandel, Dong Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPorous mediumMechanicsNonlinear systemDragPhysicsMathematical analysisMathematicsClassical mechanicsGeologyPorosityGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface fluid flows coupled with porous media flows in substrates occur in many circumstances in industry and natural settings. In this paper, we investigate the long wave solutions for the surface flows on inclined porous media. The important feature is that such flows are derived by the Navier-Stokes equations governing the clear flows in the surface fluids and the nonlinear Forchheimer’s equations for the porous media flows in substrates. The problem is reduced to a corresponding Orr-Sommerfeld problem by linearizing the infinitesimal perturbations in the system of coupled equations for analyzing long wave solutions of surface flows. Numerical analysis is taken by using Chebyshev collocation numerical method to the eigenvalue problems of the Orr-Sommerfeld systems for analyzing critical condition and stable region of long wave solutions. We compare the result with that for very small drag constant by Darcy’s law and study numerically the effects of parameters including various drag constants on the long wave solutions with Forchheimer’s law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP AdvancesSame topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207