Sustainable reuse options of treated effluents: a case study from Muscat, Oman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oman, being a semi-arid country, is in great need for extensive reuse practices of treated wastewater effluents. However, these practices need to be environmentally and economically feasible under the prevailing sophisticated treatment systems, inadequate infrastructure including sewers and wastewater-treatment plants (WWTPs). This study attempts to provide decision makers with a comprehensive characterisation of treated wastewater effluents in Muscat and to assess public opinions towards various reuse options of treated wastewater. Results from characterisation of the treated wastewater indicate great performance of the WWTPs in removing biological oxygen (O 2 ) demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD), as the maximum BOD and COD observed were less than 4 and 60 mg/l, respectively. The turbidity was found very low (below 3 nephelometric turbidity units), including total suspended solids of 13 mg/l. Most of the results showed relatively low counts of the total coliform bacteria except where a high variation was observed (400–2400 most probable number/100 ml). However, the aforementioned water quality indicators were able to meet Omani standards with the exception of a few parameters. In addition, the survey showed that the public had a general understanding of the different options of treated wastewater applications including their treatment procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".