Dynamic Analysis and Design of a Novel Ring-Based Vibratory Energy Harvester
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to focus on the design and analysis of a novel ring-based mono-stable energy-harvesting device that is considered as an alternative to the beam and tube models used thus far. The highly sensitive ring second flexural mode, when combined with the nonlinear external magnetic force, results in an ideal combination that yields increased frequency range, and can be considered as novel in the field of vibration-based energy harvesters. A mathematical model for the ring structure, as well as a model to generate nonlinear magnetic force that acts on the ring structure, is formulated. The discretized form of the governing equations is shown to represent a Duffing oscillator in the presence of an external magnetic field. The forms of the system potential energy, as well as the restoring force, are examined to ensure that the mono-stable behavior exists in the proposed model. Numerical predictions of time response, frequency response, phase diagram, and bifurcations map when the system is subjected to ambient harmonic excitation, have been performed for the purposes of gaining an insight into the dynamics and power generation of this new class of harvesters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".