Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Professional, contemporary dancers typically transition into another role or industry when their bodies begin to show signs of ageing in their mid-30s. In ‘Physical and Mental Demands Experienced by Ageing Dancers: Strategies and values’, the dance dramaturg and scholar Pil Hansen and the dance scientist Sarah J. Kenny take a close look at how dancers who continue to dance past this point and into their 60s, experience and meet the demands of professional dance praxis. Through a qualitative pilot study with three ageing Canadian dancers, Hansen and Kenny identify common demanding factors and strategies that these ageing dancers have developed to address them. When discussed in light of related studies, results indicate that interactions between a set of material, discursive and physical factors need to be addressed to help dancers build long-life careers. Findings also suggest the possibility that advanced cognitive and artistic strategies may provide essential support for the mature dancer’s physical practice and expressivity while countering the cognitive decline otherwise caused by ageing. It will require a multi-disciplinary research effort, involving a larger group of participants, to further understand the perceived demands and strategies utilized by aging dancers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it